×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 218208 articles on Disgaea Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



    Disgaea Wiki

    User:AlexanderCargill

    file down site
    Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

    Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

    Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

    Webhard

    It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

    In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.

    You must share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

    According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

    It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

    It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

    If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

    There are the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

    If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)


    Dropbox

    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

    There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



    The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

    The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

    There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself can't be documented.

    There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

    Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

    File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

    Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

    It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***

    Skydrive

    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

    The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.

    My blog post; 드라마 다시보기