lung cancer lawsuit are exposed to carcinogens. Exposure to diesel fuel creosote, creosote and benzene among other toxic substances has led to cancer and other chronic diseases like leukemia, lung cancer, mesothelioma bladder cancer and kidney cancer.Call a railroad cancer lawyer now for a no-cost initial consultation If you or someone close to you has been diagnosed with an illness of serious severity that is related to your job at railroad.Exposure to carcinogensRailroad workers are exposed various carcinogens that are dangerous on a daily basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Railroad cancer lawsuits against various railroad companies have been filed in huge number. These lawsuits have been filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) that was created in 1908.The victims who contract cancer as a result of exposure to the workplace may be qualified for compensation. A railroad injury lawyer will evaluate a claim by a victim and determine whether there is a FELA lawsuit can be filed against the business that caused their illness.A railroad worker could be entitled to compensation for medical expenses loss of wages, medical expenses and other damages related to their illness. A lawyer can help the client with filing a suit prior to the three-year deadline set by FELA.James Brown, the plaintiff claims that Leukemia was contracted by him after years exposed to chemicals without protection like creosote or degreasing chemicals. He was exposed to brake shoes, tank cars, cabooses and brake shoes. bnsf lawsuit claims to have stood on railroad ties that smelled of creosote. He also saw placards on train cars with skulls and crossbones, warning that the contents contained toxic substances. He claims that he was exposed to diesel fumes working on locomotive engines or when he stopped in tunnels. bnsf lawsuit caused him headaches and caused breathing difficulties.Failure to Provide an Occupational Safety EnvironmentWhile railroad work has always been a high-risk job, modern studies show that a lot of common railway-related occupational hazards have a direct correlation to cancer and other serious diseases. Federal law requires that railroad employers give their workers adequate protection and direction to ensure their safety. If they do not, they could be liable for serious injuries that result in death and financial ruin. Kidney cancer lawsuit should seek legal counsel from a knowledgeable lawyer If you were a railroad worker or have loved ones who were. An attorney can help you determine if there is a legal claim that is because of your work-related exposure to carcinogens which are potentially deadly. There is a three-year period of limitations, therefore it is imperative to contact an attorney as soon as possible.In addition to asbestos, railroad workers are also exposed to toxic chemicals, such as creosote, diesel fumes, and exhaust. These toxic fumes are typically the reason for cancer, including mesothelioma, as well as other lung diseases. If you've been diagnosed with one of these diseases it is essential that you consult a skilled railroad accident lawyer as soon as you can.The plaintiff was employed by the ICRC from September 1975 to December 2015. He claims that his work with the ICRC led to his development of renal (and later adrenal) cancer. Kidney cancer lawsuit claims that he was continuously exposed to the dangerous chemical carbon tetrachloride that is used by railroads to clean their tracks and braking systems.NegligenceA lawsuit against a railroad company can be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which allows railroad workers to file a complaint directly against their employers. In order for a worker to pursue damages, they must prove that the railroad company's negligence was the cause of their illness or injury.In his time on the railway, plaintiff Greger was exposed to many hazardous chemicals and environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride, a chemical, was used to clean rail and brake systems. He claims that the company did not take the time to warn him about the dangers of the chemical, which has been associated with cancer.He also walked over rail ties covered in creosote, which he claims was recognized as a danger. He also breathed in diesel fumes from the cabs of locomotives and testified that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult, and caused headaches. He was also exposed to diesel exhaust while in tunnels of locomotives that were running, and claims that this caused him to feel sick.He claims that when he sought out doctors about the connection between his railway work kidney cancer, as well as his doctors, they refused to provide any details. He claims that this was a form of negligence and that the railway should have known about the link between these exposures to kidney cancer. He seeks compensation for his medical expenses, suffering and pain, loss of earnings and emotional stress.DamagesIn a railroad cancer lawsuit, damages are a combination between medical expenses, lost wages, and other expenses. The amount of these damages could vary greatly based on the specific case. A skilled lawyer will work to ensure that you are fully compensated for your losses.In one example the man was 51 years old and diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He was employed as a maintenance of way employee for Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad from 1976 to 2008, as a machinist. He was exposed to chemicals containing creosote and benzene. and degreasing agents.Railroad companies are legally responsible for adhering to workplace safety rules. This includes safeguarding workers from carcinogens. If a railroad company does not comply in its obligation to protect workers the consequences for the victims and their families can be devastating.Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands injured individuals including railroad workers who were exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us today to arrange free consultation with a experienced lawyer for railroad injuries. The founder Andrew Hughes actually defended railroads in FELA cases for most of his legal career, so He is knowledgeable about the laws surrounding these claims and the conditions that may result from work exposure.