csx railroad lawsuit are frequently exposed to carcinogens that are dangerous. Exposure to toxic substances like diesel fuel, benzene, and creosote has been linked to cancers and chronic illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer as well as bladder cancer.If csx lawsuit or someone you care about is suffering from an illness of serious severity that was linked to your work with the railway, contact a qualified railroad cancer attorney now for a free consultation.Exposure to CarcinogensRailroad workers are exposed to a variety of dangerous carcinogens on a regular basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Many railroad cancer lawsuits have been filed against various railroad companies. These lawsuits were filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act, that was passed in 1908.Patients who contract cancer due to exposure to work-related hazards may be entitled to compensation. A skilled lawyer for railroad injuries will examine a victim's claim to determine if there is a viable FELA lawsuit against the company that caused their condition.Railroad workers may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses or lost wages, as well as other damages resulting from their illness. csx railroad lawsuit can help a client file a lawsuit within the three-year time frame of limitations set by FELA.Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he was diagnosed with leukemia as a result from years of working on trains and being exposed to chemicals such as creosote and degreasing solvents. He was exposed to brake shoes, cabooses, tank cars and brake shoes. He claims that he stood on railroad ties that smelled of creosote and saw signs on train vehicles with skulls and crossbones, warning that the contents contained toxic substances. He claims that he was also exposed to diesel fumes working on engines for locomotives or in tunnels when he stopped. The toxins made breathing difficult and caused headaches.Inability to provide a Safe Work EnvironmentWhile railroad work has always been a high-risk job, new studies have revealed that many of the most common railroad-related hazards have a direct connection to cancer and other serious illnesses. Federal law requires railroad employers to provide workers with enough direction and protection in order to keep them safe. If they fail to do so with the law, they could be held responsible for serious injuries that result in death or financial ruin.If you are a railroad worker or have a family member who worked for a railroad and you are interested in seeking legal advice from an experienced attorney. An attorney can determine if your exposure to carcinogens on the job is enough for you to bring an action. A three-year statute of limitation is in place, which means you must contact an attorney as soon as possible.Railroad workers are exposed toxic chemicals, such as creosote, diesel fumes and exhaust. Often, these toxic fumes can lead to cancer in a variety of forms including mesothelioma, among other lung diseases. If you've been diagnosed with any of these diseases, it is critical to consult a knowledgeable railroad injury lawyer right away.The plaintiff was employed by the ICRC as a mechanic/carman between September 1975 to December 2015. He alleges that his employment with the ICRC led to the development of renal (and later adrenal) cancer. He alleges that he was continuously exposed to the hazardous chemical carbon tetrachloride. It is utilized by railroads to cleanse their tracks and braking systems.NegligenceA lawsuit involving railroads can be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which allows railroad workers to file complaints directly against their employers. To be eligible for damages, a worker must demonstrate that the railroad company was negligent in causing their injury or illness.In his time on the railway and in the braking system, plaintiff Greger was exposed to a variety of harmful chemicals and environmental conditions. These included carbon tetrachloride which is used to clean rail and braking systems. He claims that his company was unable to warn him about the risks of the chemical, which has been associated with cancer.He also walked across rail ties coated in creosote. He claims it was recognized as a danger. He also breathed diesel fumes in the cabs of locomotives, and testified that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult, and caused headaches. He was also exposed to diesel exhaust when he stopped in tunnels on running locomotives and claims that it made him feel ill.He claims that he inquired with his doctors about the link between his railway work and kidney cancer but they refused to offer any information about the connection. He asserts that this was negligence and that the defendant railway should be aware of the connection between these exposures and kidney cancer. He is seeking to recover compensation for his medical expenses and suffering and pain, loss of earnings and emotional distress.DamagesIn a railroad cancer lawsuit the damages are a combination of medical bills, lost wages, and other costs. The amount of these damages could vary greatly based on the particular situation. A competent lawyer will work to ensure that you are fully compensated for your losses.In one instance one case, a man aged 51 was diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He was maintenance of way employees for Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad from 1976 to 2008 as a machine operator. He was exposed to chemicals containing creosote, benzene, and degreasing agents.Railroad companies are legally accountable for ensuring that they adhere to safety regulations. This includes protecting workers from carcinogens. If a railroad company fails in this duty and causes harm to victims and their families can be devastating.The lawyers at Hughes Law Offices have represented thousands injured victims, including many railroad workers who have been exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us today to arrange free consultation with an experienced lawyer for railroad injuries. Andrew Hughes, the founder of the firm, has been defending railroads in FELA claims for the bulk of his legal career. He is knowledgeable of the legal requirements and the risks that could result from exposure to the workplace.