Railroad Lawsuit Kidney CancerRailroad workers are often exposed to carcinogens that can cause cancer. Exposure to diesel fuel, creosote, benzene, and other toxic substances has led to cancer as well as other chronic illnesses like lung cancer, leukemia, mesothelioma, bladder cancer and kidney cancer.If you or someone you love has developed a serious illness that was connected to your work on railroads, contact an experienced lawyer for railroad cancer today for a no-cost consultation.Exposure to carcinogensRailroad workers are exposed to many carcinogens on a daily basis. railroad workers cancer lawsuit include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Many lawsuits involving cancer in railroads have been filed against a variety of railroad companies. The lawsuits were filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act, created in 1908.Patients who contract cancer due to on-the-job exposure to toxins may be entitled to compensation. A railroad injury lawyer will examine a claim of a victim and determine whether a FELA lawsuit can be filed against the company that caused the illness.A railroad worker may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses as well as lost wages and other damages resulting from their illness. An attorney can help the client file a lawsuit within the three-year time frame of limitations set by FELA.Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he developed leukemia as a result from years of working on trains exposed to chemicals such as creosote and degreasing solvents. He worked on tank cars, brake shoes and cabooses. He claims to have walked across railroad ties that smelled like creosote, and saw plaques with skulls and crosses on train cars, signalling toxic substances. He also claims that he was exposed to diesel fumes working on engines of locomotives and when he stopped in tunnels. The toxins caused him headaches and caused breathing difficulties.Failure to Provide a Safe Work EnvironmentAlthough railroad work has always been a risky job, new studies have revealed that many common railway-related occupational hazards have a direct link to cancer and other serious illnesses. Federal law requires railroad companies to provide workers with enough direction and protection to keep them safe. If they fail to provide this they could be held accountable for serious injuries that result in death and financial ruin.If you are a railroad employee or have a loved one who was a railway worker and you are interested in seeking legal help from an experienced attorney. An attorney can determine if your exposure to carcinogens on the job is enough to allow you to bring an action. There is a three-year period of limitations, therefore it is important to contact a lawyer early as you can.Railroad workers are exposed toxic chemicals like creosote as well as diesel fumes and exhaust. These toxic fumes are often the source of cancers, including mesothelioma as well as other lung diseases. It is imperative to seek the help of a lawyer for railroad accidents immediately if you've been diagnosed with one of these illnesses.The plaintiff was employed by the ICRC as a mechanic/carman between September 1975 until December 2015. He claims that his time at the ICRC led to him developing renal (and then adrenal) cancer. He alleges that he was continually exposed to the hazardous chemical carbon tetrachloride. This is utilized by railroads to cleanse their tracks and braking systems.NegligenceA lawsuit against a railroad company can be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), which allows railroad employees to file claims directly against their employers. To be able to be able to claim damages, they must establish that negligence by the railroad company contributed to their illness or injury.Plaintiff Greger was exposed while working on the railroad, to a number toxic chemicals and environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride was utilized to clean brake and rail systems. He claims that the company failed to inform him of the dangers of this chemical which is known to cause cancer.He also claims that he walked on rail ties that were covered in creosote. This substance was considered as a hazard. He also inhaled diesel fumes in the cabs of locomotives and testified that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult and caused headaches. He was also exposed to diesel exhaust while he was in the tunnels of running locomotives and claims that it caused him to feel sick.He claims he questioned his doctors about the link between his railway work and kidney cancer, but they did not provide any details about the connection. He claims that this was negligence and that the railroad should be aware of the link between these exposures to kidney cancer. He seeks compensation for medical expenses and suffering and suffering, loss of earnings and emotional stress.DamagesThe damages in a railroad lawsuit kidney cancer claim result from medical bills as well as lost wages and other expenses. The amount of these damages can vary greatly based on the specific case. A competent attorney will ensure that you get the maximum amount of compensation for your losses.In one instance one case, a man aged 51 was diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He worked as a machinist for Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad, from 1976 until 2008. During that period, he was exposed to years of exposure to benzene-laden chemicals, including creosote and degreasing solvents.Railroad companies are legally bound by a responsibility to adhere to government safety rules for workplaces, which include protecting workers from exposure to known carcinogens. If a railroad fails to do so, the consequences can be devastating for the victims and their families.Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands injured people including railroad workers who were exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us today to arrange free consultation with an experienced lawyer for railroad injuries. Andrew Hughes, the founder of the firm has been representing railroads in FELA claims for the majority of his legal career. He is well-versed in the law and the potential conditions that can result from exposure to the workplace.