Railroad Lawsuit Kidney CancerRailroad workers are often exposed to dangerous carcinogens. The exposure to diesel fuel, benzene, creosote and other toxic substances has led to cancer as well as other chronic conditions such as leukemia, lung cancer, mesothelioma, bladder cancer, and kidney cancer.Call a railroad cancer lawyer today for a no-cost initial consultation if you or someone close to you has been diagnosed with a serious disease that is related to your job at the railway.Exposure to CarcinogensRailroad workers are exposed to numerous carcinogens that can cause harm on a regular basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Railroad cancer lawsuit s against different railroad companies have been filed in huge number. union pacific railroad lawsuit were filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act, established in 1908.Patients who contract cancer due to on-the-job exposure could be qualified for compensation. A skilled lawyer for railroad injuries will examine a victim's claim to determine whether there is a viable FELA lawsuit against the company that caused the condition. lung cancer lawsuit may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages that result from their illness. A lawyer can assist to file a claim within the three years of limitations imposed by FELA.Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he developed leukemia as the result from years of working on trains and being exposed to chemicals like creosote and degreasing solvents. He worked on tank cars brake shoes, cabooses, and tank cars. He claims to have walked across railroad ties that smelled like creosote and saw placards bearing skulls and crosses on train cars, indicating toxic substances. He also claims he was exposed to diesel fumes while working on locomotive engines as well as when stopping in tunnels. The toxins caused headaches and caused breathing difficulties.Failure to Provide an Occupational Safety EnvironmentWhile railroad work has always been a risky work, recent studies indicate that a lot of common railway-related risks are directly linked to cancer and other serious diseases. Federal law requires that railroad employers provide their employees with adequate protection and guidance to ensure their safety. If they do not comply with the law, they could be held accountable for serious injuries that cause death or financial ruin.If you're a railroad worker or have a family member who was a railway worker it is recommended that you seek legal advice from an experienced attorney. A lawyer can help you determine if you have a case that can be pursued due to your exposure to dangerous carcinogens. A three-year statute of limitation is in place, and you should contact an attorney as soon as possible.In addition to asbestos, railroad workers also are exposed to toxic chemicals like creosote, diesel fumes and exhaust. These harmful fumes are frequently the reason for cancer, including mesothelioma, as well as other lung diseases. If you've developed any of these diseases it is essential that you speak with a skilled railroad injury lawyer as soon as possible.The plaintiff worked for the ICRC as a carman/mechanic from September 1975 until December 2015. He claims that his employment at the ICRC led to his developing renal (and later adrenal) cancer. He alleges that he was continuously exposed to the hazardous chemical carbon tetrachloride, which is used by railroads for cleaning their tracks and braking systems.NegligenceA railroad lawsuit may be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which permits railroad employees to directly lodge complaints against their employers. In order for a worker to be able to claim damages, they must establish that the railroad company's negligence played a role in causing their injury or illness.During his time working on the railway, plaintiff Greger was exposed to many toxic chemicals as well as environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride is used to clean rail and brake systems. The company didn't inform him of the possible dangers of this chemical, which is known to cause cancer.He also walked on rail ties that were coated with creosote. He claims it was recognized as a danger. He also breathed diesel fumes inside locomotive cabs and reported headaches and breathing difficulties. He claims to have been ill by diesel exhaust when he stopped in tunnels while on a locomotive.He claims that when he asked doctors about the link between his work on the railroad kidney cancer, his doctors refused to give any details. He asserts that this was a case of negligence and that the railroad should have been aware of the link between these exposures to kidney cancer. He wants to be compensated for the medical expenses in addition to pain and suffering and the loss of earnings.DamagesThe damages in a railroad lawsuit kidney cancer claim are the result of the combination of medical bills as well as lost wages and other expenses. The amount of these damages can vary greatly depending on the individual case. An experienced attorney will make sure that you are compensated fully for your losses.In one example the man was 51 years old and diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He worked as a machinist at Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad, from 1976 to 2008. In that time, he had to endure many years of exposures to benzene-based chemicals, including creosote and degreasing solvents.Railroad companies are legally bound by a obligation to adhere to the government's safety regulations for workplaces. These includes protecting workers from exposure to carcinogens that are well-known. If a railroad company fails in this duty and the consequences for victims and their families can be devastating.Hughes Law Offices has represented thousands injured people and railroad workers exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us now to get a no-cost consultation with an experienced and knowledgeable railroad injury lawyer. Andrew Hughes, the founder of the firm, has been defending railroads in FELA claims for the bulk of his legal career. He is familiar with the law and the potential conditions that can be caused by on-the-job exposure.