How to File a Railroad Lawsuit For Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseRailroad workers who suffer from occupational illnesses such as cancer are entitled to bring a lawsuit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. It isn't easy to prove a disease is connected to work.A worker, for example might have signed a waiver after settling an asbestos claim. He then sued later for a cancer that was believed to have been caused by the exposures.Statute of Limitations under the FELAIn many workers' comp cases, the clock begins to tick on the claim the moment an injury is identified. However, FELA laws allow railroad employees to file a lawsuit against the growth of lung disease and cancer long after the fact. This is why it is crucial to file a FELA injury or illness report as quickly as possible.Sadly, the railroad will attempt to dismiss a case arguing that an employee did not act within the timeframe of three years of limitations. To determine when the FELA "clock" starts courts usually look at two Supreme Court decisions.They must first determine if the railroad employee had a reason to believe that their symptoms were connected to their job. The claim is not barred in the event that the railroad employee consults a doctor, and the doctor concludes that the injuries are due to their work.A second factor to consider is the amount of the time since the railroad worker began to notice symptoms. If the employee has been suffering from breathing problems for a while and attributes the problems to his or her railway work it is likely that the railroad worker is within the time limit. If you have questions regarding your FELA claim, you should schedule an appointment with one of our lawyers.Employers' NegligenceFELA sets out a legal framework for railroad employees to bring employers who are negligent to account. In contrast to other workers, who are bound by compensation systems for workers with pre-determined benefits, railroad workers are able to sue their employers for the full value of their injuries.Our lawyers recently won the verdict in a FELA lawsuit brought by three retired Long Island Railroad machinists who suffered from COPD, chronic bronchitis and Emphysema from their exposure to asbestos while working on locomotives. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lawsuit awarded them damages of $16,400,000.The railroad claimed that the cancer of the plaintiffs was not related to their work at the railroad and the lawsuit was barred because it was more than three years since they discovered their health problems were related to their railroad jobs. Our Doran & Murphy lawyers were able to show that the railroad was not aware of its employees about asbestos's dangers and diesel exhaust while working and that the railroad didn't have safety procedures in place to protect its workers from dangerous chemicals.Though a worker has three years from the date of their diagnosis to start a FELA lawsuit however, it is best to seek out a skilled lawyer as soon as is possible. The earlier our lawyer begins gathering witness statements, records and other evidence the better chance is of a successful claim.CausationIn a personal-injury action plaintiffs must prove that the actions of a defendant caused their injuries. This is known as legal causation. It is vital that an attorney carefully examines a claim before filing in the court.Railroad workers are exposed to hundreds of chemicals, including carcinogens and other contaminants, via diesel exhaust on its own. These microscopic particles are able to penetrate deep into the lung tissue and cause inflammation and damage. As time passes, these damages accumulate and result in debilitating conditions such as chronic lung inflammation and COPD.One of our FELA case involves a former train conductor who was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases and asthma after a long period of time in cabs without any protection. Additionally, he was diagnosed with back pains that were debilitating due to his years of lifting, pushing and pulling. His doctor told him these problems were a result of the years of exposure to diesel fumes. He believes this caused the onset of all of his other health issues.Our attorneys were able to preserve favorable trial court rulings and a comparatively low federal jury award for our client in this case. The plaintiff claimed that the derailment of his train and subsequent release of vinyl chloride from the rail yard affected his physical condition and his emotional state, as he feared that he would develop cancer. However, the USSC determined that the railroad in question could not be the cause of his fear of developing cancer because he had previously gave up the right to pursue such a claim in a prior lawsuit.DamagesIf you have suffered an injury during your employment on a railroad, you may be able to pursue a lawsuit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. You could receive damages for your injuries through this route, including reimbursement for medical expenses and pain and suffering. However, this process is complex and you should speak with a lawyer who handles train accidents to understand your options.The first step in a railroad lawsuit is to show that the defendant had a responsibility to the plaintiff of care. The plaintiff must show that the defendant violated this duty of care by failing to protect them from injury. The plaintiff should then demonstrate that the breach of duty by the defendant was a direct reason for the injury.A railroad worker who develops cancer due to their work must prove that the employer failed properly to inform them of the dangers they could face. They must also prove that their negligence caused their cancer.In one case we defended a railroad company against a suit brought by an employee who claimed that his cancer was caused by exposure to diesel and asbestos. We argued that the plaintiff's claim was not time-barred because the plaintiff had signed a consent form in a previous lawsuit against the defendant.