Railroad Lawsuit Kidney CancerRail workers are exposed to carcinogens. Exposure to harmful substances such as diesel fuel, benzene, and creosote has been linked to cancers as well as chronic conditions such as mesothelioma, lung cancer as well as bladder cancer.Call a railroad cancer lawyer today for a no-cost initial consultation for anyone who to you has been diagnosed with a serious illness which is connected to work at railroad.Exposure to CarcinogensEvery day, railroad workers are exposed to carcinogens. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Railroad cancer lawsuits against a variety of railroad companies have been filed in huge numbers. These lawsuits have been filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) that was created in 1908.Patients who contract cancer as a result of exposure to toxins could be entitled to compensation. An experienced railroad injury lawyer will review a claim of a victim to determine whether there is an appropriate FELA lawsuit against the business responsible for the illness.A railroad employee could be entitled to compensation to cover medical expenses, lost wages and other damages resulting from their illness. Lawyers can assist clients file a lawsuit within the three-year time frame of limitations imposed by FELA.Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he suffered from leukemia as a consequence from years of working on trains exposed to chemicals such as creosote and degreasing solvents. Kidney cancer lawsuit worked on brake shoes, tanks cars, cabooses and brake shoes. He claims he walked across railroad ties that smelled of creosote, and saw placards with skulls and crosses on train vehicles, indicating toxic substances. He also claims to have been exposed to diesel fumes when working on locomotive engines and when stopping in tunnels. The toxins made his breathing difficult and caused headaches.Inability to provide a Safe Work EnvironmentAlthough railroad work has always been a risky job, modern studies show that a lot of common railroad-related hazards have a direct link to cancer and other serious illnesses. bnsf lawsuit requires railroad employers to provide workers with enough direction and protection in order to ensure their safety. If they fail to comply with this requirement, they could be held accountable for severe injuries that cause death or financial ruin.If you're a railroad worker or have a loved one who was a railroad employee You should think about seeking legal help from an experienced attorney. An attorney can help you determine if your exposure to carcinogens while on working is sufficient for you to bring a lawsuit. A three-year statute of limitations is in effect, so you must contact an attorney as soon as you can.In addition to asbestos, railroad workers are also exposed toxic chemicals, such as creosote and diesel fumes and exhaust. Often, these harmful fumes can cause cancer of various types, including mesothelioma as well as other lung diseases. If you've developed any of these diseases it is essential to speak with a qualified railroad accident lawyer as soon as you can.The plaintiff worked for the ICRC as a carman/mechanic between September 1975 until December 2015. Multiple myeloma lawsuit claims that his position at the ICRC led to him developing renal (and then adrenal) cancer. He claims that he was continually exposed to the hazardous chemical carbon tetrachloride. This is employed by railroads to clean their tracks and braking systems.NegligenceA lawsuit involving railroads can be filed under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) which permits railroad workers to directly complain against their employers. To be legally entitled to damages, a worker must demonstrate that the railroad company was negligent in causing his or her illness or injury.Plaintiff Greger was exposed when working on the railroad, to a number hazardous chemicals and environmental conditions. Carbon tetrachloride, a chemical, was used to clean brake and rail systems. He claims that the company did not notify him of the dangers of this chemical which is known to cause cancer.He also claims to have walked on rail ties that were coated in creosote. The substance was regarded as harmful. He also inhaled diesel fumes in the cabs of locomotives and testified that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult, and caused headaches. He claims to have been sickened by diesel exhaust when he stopped in tunnels while on a locomotive.He claims that when he asked doctors about the link between his railroad work, kidney cancer and his doctors refused to provide any details. He asserts that this was negligence and that the defendant railway should be aware of the connection between these exposures to kidney cancer. He seeks compensation for the medical expenses along with pain and suffering as well as lost earnings.DamagesThe damages in a railroad lawsuit kidney cancer claim are a result of a combination of medical bills as well as lost wages and other expenses. The amount of damages can differ based on the particular case. A competent attorney will ensure that you receive full compensation for your losses.In one instance an older man, 51, was diagnosed with myelodysplastic disorder (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He was a machinist with Chicago & North Western Railway, and its successor Union Pacific Railroad, from 1976 until 2008. He was exposed to chemicals that contained benzene, including creosote, and degreasing agents.Railroad companies are legally accountable for adhering to workplace safety rules. This includes safeguarding workers from carcinogens. If a railroad company fails to follow these rules and the consequences could be devastating for the victims and their families.The attorneys at Hughes Law Offices have represented thousands of injured people, including many railroad workers who were exposed to toxic fumes. Call us today for a free consultation with an experienced lawyer for railroad injuries. The Founder Andrew Hughes actually defended railroads in FELA cases for the majority of his legal career. As such, his knowledge of the laws that surround these claims as well as the risks that can result from on-the-job exposure.