Railroad Lawsuit Kidney CancerRail workers are exposed carcinogens. The exposure to diesel fuel, creosote, benzene, and other toxic substances has contributed to cancer and other chronic diseases like lung cancer, leukemia, mesothelioma bladder cancer and kidney cancer.Contact a railroad cancer lawyer today to schedule a complimentary initial consultation if you or someone close to you has been diagnosed with an illness of serious severity that is related to your employment with a railway.Exposure to carcinogensRailroad workers are exposed to numerous carcinogens that can cause harm on a regular basis. These include diesel exhaust, asbestos and benzene. Many lawsuits involving cancer in railroads have been filed against various railroad companies. The lawsuits were filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which was passed in 1908.Patients who contract cancer due to on-the-job exposure could be entitled to compensation. A railroad injury lawyer will review a victim’s claim and determine whether there is a FELA lawsuit can be filed against the company responsible for their illness.A railroad worker could be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages as well as other damages caused by their illness. A lawyer can assist clients file a lawsuit within the three-year statute of limitations imposed by FELA.Plaintiff James Brown alleges that he developed leukemia as the result of his work in trains that were exposed to chemicals such as creosote, and degreasing solvents. He was exposed to brake shoes tanks cars, cabooses and brake shoes. He claims he stood on railroad ties that smelled like creosote, and he saw signs on train cars with skulls and crossbones indicating the contents contained toxic substances. He also claims he was exposed to diesel fumes working on engines of locomotives and when stopping in tunnels. The toxins caused him headaches and made breathing difficult. Pancreatic cancer lawsuit to provide a safe Work EnvironmentDespite the fact that railroad work has always been associated with a high risk, modern studies have revealed that a lot of the hazards common to work that railway workers face are directly linked to cancer and other serious illnesses. Federal law requires that railroads provide their workers with adequate protection and direction to ensure their safety. If they do not comply with the law, they could be held responsible for serious injuries that result in death, or financial ruin.You should seek advice from a knowledgeable lawyer if you were a railroad worker or if you have loved ones who were. An attorney can determine if your exposure to carcinogens during the job is enough for you to start an action. There is a 3-year statute of limitations, so it is essential to contact a lawyer as soon as possible.Railroad workers are exposed toxic chemicals, such as creosote as well as diesel fumes and exhaust. These toxic fumes are often the reason for cancer, including mesothelioma, and other lung diseases. It is important that you get in touch with a railroad accident lawyer immediately if you've been diagnosed with one of these conditions. Bladder cancer lawsuit was employed by the ICRC from September 1975 to December 2015. He claims that his employment at the ICRC resulted in him developing renal (and later adrenal) cancer. He claims that he was continuously exposed to the dangerous chemical carbon tetrachloride, which is employed by railroads to clean their tracks and braking systems.NegligenceA railroad lawsuit can be filed under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) which allows railroad employees to directly make complaints against their employers. To be able to be able to claim damages, they must establish that negligence by the railroad company contributed to their injury or illness.Plaintiff Greger was exposed while working on the railroad, to a variety of toxic chemicals and environmental conditions. These included carbon tetrachloride which is used to clean the braking and rail systems. He claims that his company was unable to warn him about the risks of the chemical that has been associated with cancer.He also claims to have walked across rail ties that were covered in creosote. This substance was recognized as harmful. He also inhaled diesel fumes inside locomotive cabs and claimed that the fumes "gagged him," made breathing difficult, and caused headaches. He also breathed in diesel exhaust while stopping in the tunnels of running locomotives, and claims that this caused him to feel sick.He claims he questioned his doctors about the connection between his railway work and kidney cancer, but they did not provide any details about this connection. He claims that this was a form of negligence and that the defendant railway should have known about the connection between these exposures to kidney cancer. He is seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering and lost earnings.DamagesIn a railroad cancer lawsuit damages are a mix between medical bills, lost wages and other expenses. The amount of damages may differ widely based on the circumstances. A competent lawyer will work to ensure that you get the maximum amount of compensation for your losses.In one instance an older man, 51, was diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2008. He worked as a machinist at Chicago & North Western Railway and its successor Union Pacific Railroad, from 1976 until 2008. During that time, he endured years of exposure to benzene-rich chemicals like creosote as well as degreasing solvents.Railroad companies are legally accountable for adhering to safety rules. This includes protecting workers from carcinogens. If a railroad company fails to adhere to these regulations and suffers the consequences, it can be devastating for the victims and their families.The attorneys at Hughes Law Offices have represented thousands injured people, including many railroad workers who were exposed to toxic fumes. Contact us now for a free consultation from an experienced railroad injury attorney. Founder Andrew Hughes actually defended railroads in FELA cases for the majority of his legal career, therefore he is well-versed in the laws that surround these claims and the conditions that can result from on-the-job exposure.